Clairet Lipide

Barnes & Noble has staged an unlikely comeback. CEO James Daunt shared 4 key lessons from its turnaround.

· Business Insider

Barnes & Noble CEO James Daunt.
  • Barnes & Noble CEO James Daunt has executed an unlikely turnaround at the storied bookstore chain.
  • Daunt said that steady improvements and empowering local booksellers have powered its comeback.
  • He spoke about changing culture, data dangers, mistakes, and the power of authenticity on a podcast.

Bookstores might seem old school in the AI era, but Barnes & Noble has staged a fairy-tale comeback under CEO James Daunt.

Visit grenadier.co.za for more information.

After shrinking to under 600 locations in 2023, the storied American bookstore chain opened 57 locations in 2024 — more than in the entire decade between 2009 and 2019.

It expanded by more than 60 stores last year, and it's targeting another 60 this year, it said in a news release this week.

Barnes & Noble was taken private in August 2019 when Elliott Management acquired it for close to $700 million, including debt. The hedge fund tasked Daunt — who led the turnaround of British bookstore chain Waterstones, which Elliott acquired in 2018 — to revitalize Barnes & Noble as well.

Daunt explained how he turned the page at Barnes & Noble during the latest episode of the "Masters of Scale" podcast. Here are the key insights from the conversation.

Culture change

Daunt said Barnes & Noble had the same core problem as Waterstones: its bookstores "weren't very good."

He said that for booksellers, attention to detail, presentation, service, assortment, inventory, and judgment all matter. Steadily improving those things year after year has been key to his success, he said.

But Daunt said another key plank of his strategy has been to shift away from centralized control of stores, and put local booksellers in charge instead.

"Almost everything I do is about flattening those hierarchies, and then trying to introduce collective responsibility amongst the team once you've done that," he said.

When each store's team is running the show, that's a "much nicer way to work, much more engaging and much more empowering, and all of those good things," he said.

"But it's so much more difficult that often people resist it: 'We'd rather have the hierarchy, just tell me what to do, please.'"

Daunt said that changing a company's culture takes time, and it's like "stretching a rubber band. The minute you relax, it just pops back."

Data danger

Daunt — who built his own independent bookstore chain, Daunt Books, before taking charge of Waterstones in 2011 — said that store data can be more of a curse than a blessing.

"The data can occasionally be an interesting reference point, but it's the judgments you make almost in defiance of the data that will give you an inspiring store," he said.

As data is often held centrally, relying on it can unlock a "Pandora's box" where it's used to "impose uniformity on the stores, and that really is the death knell for us," he said.

Setting aside the data "empowers the local stores to really start interrogating how they're engaging with their customer base," and to rely on their "gut instinct" when merchandising, he said.

He gave the example of a data-driven store allocating too much shelf space to board books, overwhelming parents whose young kids would happily read the same titles again and again, while not giving preteen readers the large array of books they want.

Daunt also noted that "booksellers and numbers tend to be sitting in opposite corners of the room."

"We are the nerds who read all our books, and when we got to the maths and science, just gave up," he quipped.

Forgetting mistakes

Daunt said that a key element of his approach — which has clear parallels to Warren Buffett's model of decentralized autonomy at Berkshire Hathaway — is moving on when mistakes get made.

Instead of scrutinizing and punishing errors, he prefers to "not look in the rear-view mirror," say something was "idiotic," and move on.

He's found that this encourages junior employees to challenge decisions from higher up and frees senior staff to change their minds.

Spreading the word

Daunt said that Barnes & Noble has no marketing department and has "zero marketing dollars to spend."

"But what we do have is young booksellers," he said. "And again, this model of leaving stores to do what they want turns out to be fantastically adapted for the social media age."

Daunt hailed BookTok, the passionate community of readers on TikTok, as a powerful source of word-of-mouth recommendations.

"As long as we leave it to the kids with the blue hair, we'll be fine," he joked.

Daunt added that there's no need for a broader marketing push behind popular books.

"The booksellers are fantastically good at communicating within store to store," he said. "Books that start taking off in one store just sort of spread like a rash through the business," he continued, adding that the organic process has a valuable authenticity.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Read full story at source

BJP Looks To Repeat Bengal Success In Punjab, Holds Talks With Akali Dal

· NDTV

BJP leaders believe alliance with the Shiromani Akali Dal holds potential for political gain for both parties and would also strengthen cooperation between them

Visit syntagm.co.za for more information.

Read full story at source

Report: Leeds United have bid rejected for Chelsea forward

· Yahoo Sports

Report: Leeds United have bid rejected for Chelsea forward

Chelsea Reject Leeds Loan Bid for Mykhailo Mudryk as Transfer Talks Continue

Visit moryak.biz for more information.

Leeds United have seen an opening loan bid for Mykhailo Mudryk knocked back by Chelsea, although the situation remains active and there is no indication that discussions have ended. According to TeamTalk, Leeds remain in contact after an initial approach that “did not meet Chelsea’s demands”.

The broad picture is clear. Chelsea want to place Mudryk in an environment where he can secure regular minutes and begin rebuilding match sharpness after a long period away from competitive football. The 25-year-old “has not played competitive football for almost two years”, with his most recent Chelsea appearance coming in November 2024.

That context shapes everything around this negotiation. Leeds are understood to be an appealing option because they can offer a platform, yet Chelsea are weighing more than one route. The report adds that “the two clubs remain engaged in discussions and the move has not been ruled out”, which keeps the door open for further movement if the financial terms improve.

Mudryk Transfer Situation Remains Open

Chelsea’s immediate objective is practical. They “want to find Mudryk solution” and ensure he gets the “regular first-team football he needs”. It is also notable that Mudryk is “currently not training with Chelsea’s main first-team group as the club assesses his next move”.

Photo IMAGO

There are alternatives on the table too. Coventry City, now managed by Frank Lampard, are mentioned as another possible destination, while other clubs are also attentive to developments.

Xabi Alonso Waits on Next Step

Chelsea head coach Xabi Alonso offered a measured update when asked about the winger’s future. He said: “We will see, we still have time to decide and we don’t have to rush on many decisions and at the right time, we will take them. At the moment, not yet.”

That wording points to patience rather than urgency. Leeds still have a live chance, but any breakthrough is likely to depend on whether they can reshape their proposal into something Chelsea view as acceptable.

Our View

From a Leeds perspective, this is the sort of report that triggers more questions than excitement. Yes, Mykhailo Mudryk has obvious talent, and yes, if Chelsea are serious about helping him “rebuild his rhythm”, Elland Road could be a strong place to do it. But an unconvinced Leeds fan will look at the details and hesitate.

First, “has not played competitive football for almost two years” is a huge red flag. Leeds need players ready to contribute quickly, not a long-term recovery project who may need months to get anywhere near top level intensity. In the Premier League, there is no gentle runway.

Second, if Chelsea have already rejected the first bid because it “did not meet Chelsea’s demands”, then Leeds have to be disciplined. There is a difference between taking an opportunity and being talked into carrying the risk for another club. If Chelsea want him playing regularly, that benefits Chelsea too.

There is also the tactical question. Does Mudryk suit what Leeds need right now, or is this more about market opportunity than squad planning? Supporters will back bold recruitment, but only when it looks coherent. This one feels uncertain. If the terms become favourable, perhaps it is worth exploring further. If not, Leeds should walk away and focus on targets with sharper recent pedigree and fewer unknowns.

Read full story at source