From Hollywood scandals to transhuman futures: 10 new books to read
· Brisbane Times
· Brisbane Times
· Citizen

In-car technology is meant to make driving more convenient and safer, but sometimes these advanced systems can be annoying.
Modern cars can feature dozens of advanced driver assist systems which range from blind-spot monitoring to road sign recognition. For example, a car like the Omoda C7 CSH features up to 21 advanced driver-assistance systems.
Visit mwafrika.life for more information.
A recent survey by UK-based Scrap Car Comparison, seatbelt reminders topped the list for the most annoying car tech. It was followed by lane keeping assist, automatic stop-start systems, lane departure warning alerts and voice control.
Men generally reported higher levels of frustration with most types of in-car technology than women, while just over quarter of drivers don’t find any in-car tech to be irritating.
Matt Clamp, car scrappage expert at Scrap Car Comparison, cautions against disabling any of the systems, a common practice by drivers at the end of their tether.
“Even if a feature feels irritating, it’s often there for a reason. Therefore, we would never recommend disabling any of the features. Instead, we urge drivers to learn how systems work and adjust settings where possible,” says Clamp.
The survey among 2 000 car owners was conducted in March 2026 in reaction to the news of the possible introduction of the UK’s new Road Safety Strategy. It will require new vehicles to be equipped with 18 mandatory new safety features such as intelligent speed assistance and advanced distraction warnings.
At the other end of the scale, the most useful in-car technology is parking sensors. Women were more likely to value parking sensors than men, with appreciation for the feature increasing steadily with age.
Also ranking high on the list of most useful features are built-in nat nav and Bluetooth connectivity.
“Drivers clearly value technology that makes everyday tasks easier, such as parking or navigation, but features that interrupt the driving experience (such as unexpected safety warnings) or that feel overly sensitive can quickly become frustrating,” adds Clamp.
“Some of these technologies are designed to improve safety. But if they activate too frequently or without notice, drivers can see them as annoying rather than helpful.
“While some features may divide opinion, many are designed with safety in mind. Systems such as lane keeping assist and forward collision warning aim to reduce accidents. Even if they are not universally popular.”
· Business Insider
Aaron Hawkins/Getty Images/iStockphoto
Visit fishroad-app.com for more information.
It used to be "C's get degrees." Nowadays, it's "ChatGPT gets degrees."
Soon-to-be college grads benefited from ChatGPT's arrival during their first year. Many spent the better part of four years cheating (or optimizing, depending on who you ask) their way through school.
Their arrival in the workforce now raises a big question: Has using AI to get through college made them prime job candidates, or has it stunted important growth?
BI's Amanda Hoover breaks down whether this new generation's overreliance on AI is a feature or a bug.
Balancing the use of AI without sacrificing valuable experience is a top concern for executives managing junior employees.
Veteran workers can leverage AI while still drawing on years of on-the-job experience. Newcomers might be AI-native, but automating all that work could create a serious blind spot.
College grads might also lose access to the AI tools they've come to rely on.
Why? Cost and compute.
Anthropic caused an uproar when it appeared to increase pricing for its Claude Code tool. The AI giant eventually said it was only an "experiment" for 2% of new sign-ups, but not before Sam Altman and other OpenAI staffers took some shots.
(Anthropic also acknowledged that Claude Code did get worse, but denied "nerfing" it.)
It likely won't be the last AI company to test new pricing models. With a user base hooked on the efficiencies your tech delivers — and bills stacking up — why not raise the price?
It's not just about making more money. The surge of AI agents has also stretched some AI companies to the limit in terms of computing power.
Still, that constraint could create an unexpected upside: a reason to step back from the tech.
Sumeet Chabria, a longtime Wall Street tech executive who now runs the advisory firm ThoughtLinks, recently told me some of the best feedback he got from a client came when he didn't use AI.
Stuck on a plane with no WiFi, Chabria wrote a quick memo summarizing a dense cybersecurity topic in plain English, without AI. He outlined 10 actionable items. The client loved it.
Chabria isn't anti-AI. It's just an example of when humans' critical thinking takes precedence over AI's raw power. Of course, Chabria also has decades of experience in the field, helping him connect those dots.
Fresh grads don't have that benefit. Maybe ChatGPT has some ideas?
Read the original article on Business Insider